One of the battle tactics used by the secularists in America has been to redefine words, giving them new meanings meant to label the enemy (the traditionalists/conservatives) as oppressive, prejudice, divisive, archaic, stagnant, and judgmental. I have been called a homophobe numerous times by bloggers here and in other forums. This is so absurd it is funny. What does homophobia really mean? This is what Merriam-Webster has to say about it:

ho·mo·pho·bia
Pronunciation:
\ˌhō-mə-ˈfō-bē-ə\
Function:
noun
Date:
1969
: irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals
— ho·mo·pho·bic \-ˈfō-bik\ adjective

This is how the Planned Parenthood site teenwire.com defines homophobia in response to user a question:

What is homophobia and what are the symptoms?

bexter345 (11.23.05)

The Answer:

Dear bexter345,

Homophobia isn’t a disease — it is a form of prejudice. Homophobia is the fear and hatred of people who are — or who appear to be — lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, or questioning (LGBTQ). It is caused by ignorance, misinformation, or lack of understanding about LGBTQ people are really like.

Being different from society’s sexual norms can be very difficult in our culture. Most people who are homophobic are worried about their own sexuality and project that fear on others. It is important to accept people, and ourselves, for being who we are.

Did you notice the difference? The dictionary rightly points out that homophobia is a discrimination and aversion based on sexual preference. Planned Parenthood goes a step future by conflating homophobia with hatred spawned by a lack of knowledge regarding homosexuals. In some cases criticism comes from ignorance, but most of the time it comes from a clear understanding of right and wrong—a concept that is fading fast.

Redefining words is the only way to bring normality to an otherwise abnormal and perverse lifestyle. It is a battle plan. As far as I am concerned, the word “homophobia” does not exist. It is a product of an overly politically correct society that has lost any sense of absolutes. I am telling you right now that humanity is not far away from “molestophobia.” When people criticize child molesters down the road are you going to say it is out of hatred and fear of one’s own desire to rape children? Are you going to call Christians names for speaking out against this moral travesty? After all, child molesters have rights too. Maybe they were born to love children. Are you going to deny their fundamental right to have sex with your child? Sounds unimaginable doesn’t it. Not to someone who sees the larger picture.

In addition to hosting prostitution solicitations, Craigslist.org also promotes adultery. Here are some of the outrageous and PG rated personal ads specifically targeting sex with married and/or by married individuals:

• married male seeking married female seeking discreet relations
• married man looking for a married woman today!!
• married couple looking for a playmate
• married but looking
• married women need love too!!
• married with permission
• seeking married redhead
• married with herpes (What?)
• seeking first-time affair
• wife looking for a woman for her husband…NO JOKE!
• it’s my husband’s turn
• married gentleman in miami for business
• i want a married couple
• married black woman wanted
• seeking housewife for daytime fun

These ads are overwhelmingly placed by married men and not always with heterosexual intentions. The ads placed by women are overwhelmingly looking to bring extra bodies into the marriage bed. All these ads, and I will say that these ads are mild compared to most posted, are prototypical of a human race in decline. We live in a pornographic culture and are now demanding a pornographic life. I do not expect anything less from a service based in San Francisco, the most morally corrupt city in America.

Peter Kreeft, in his book How To Win The Culture War: A Christian Battle Plan For A Society In Crisis, described the big three media establishments (ABC, NBC, and CBS) as “the unholy trinity.” Here it is.

Do you like to get naked without needing sex? Do you dream of taking a nude cruise? Here is a website for you. It will tell you exactly where in the U.S. you can feel “liberated” in your contribution to cultural decay. This site is beyond its time. It shows what life will be like in the future—uninhibited and legal public nudity. Just remember, “it’s not rude to go nude.”

All of that is bogus. Seriously, do naturists think walking around nude is not about sex. They will say it is about free expression without cover—the display of the true self. Whatever. Sites like this legitimize this type of activity which leads to its eventual normalization in the future. Do you want to go to the grocery store and see a bunch a naked people walking around the produce? How about sitting in a seat at the movie theater just occupied by a nudist, where his wife just felt like pleasuring him during the film because she was turned on by the acting.

You may think it is absurd to believe our culture is headed towards these scenarios, but I do not. When this country was established with a Judeo-Christian foundation, did our founding fathers envision legalized gay marriage. Probably not, but we are heading in that direction. Did they foresee and desire “designer babies” and legalized murder (abortion). No. That kind of thinking would have been absurd and may have gotten one shot.

Where is the line drawn? After legalized gay marriage and public nudity, do we legalize beastiality so as to not discriminate against those you enjoy having sex with their pets? Do we legalize human/pet marriage? What about human/inanimate object marriage for those in love with their computer or car or anything else without life? As the C.S. Lewis scholar Peter Kreeft says, Progress is not progress “if the goal line recedes in front of the runner as fast as the runner runs.”